---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

---

In forex trading, every trader should develop a unique and comprehensive investment system and strictly adhere to their own trading principles. This personalized trading framework is key to navigating complex and volatile market conditions.

---

Forex traders should focus on instruments they are familiar with and understand. The market is filled with numerous instruments, and no trader can be fully knowledgeable about them all. Many novice traders often lack this understanding and blindly dabble in a wide variety of instruments. However, without sufficient knowledge of a particular instrument, how can one accurately grasp its trends and profit from them? This is undoubtedly a major cause of losses.
In forex trading, traders should focus on market conditions they understand and can capitalize on. While profitable opportunities exist daily, capturing every market move is nearly impossible. Those who claim to be able to capitalize on every market trend are nothing more than mythical figures, and mythical figures do not exist in real trading. Many traders lose money precisely because they blindly chase every market trend, fearing to miss any opportunity to make money. However, this mentality often leads them to trade frequently, which in turn seizes every opportunity to lose money. Therefore, traders must learn to be patient and only trade in markets they understand.
In forex trading, once a trader identifies a trading signal, they should decisively execute their trading system. If the system signals an entry, they should enter the market without hesitation; if the system prompts a stop-loss, they should resolutely execute the stop-loss. Trading is a natural process, with gains and losses; not every trade is profitable. Traders must view this rationally and objectively, avoiding violating trading rules due to overconfidence or greed.
In forex trading, position management is crucial. Traders should always start with a small position. This way, even if they make a mistake, they can still attack or defend. Specific position management strategies should be flexibly adjusted based on factors such as the trader's account size, risk tolerance, and market conditions. When increasing positions, traders should carefully assess market risks to avoid over-increasing positions, which could lead to uncontrolled account risk.
Most forex traders suffer losses or even bankruptcies because they fear missing out on every market opportunity, blindly placing orders and overweighting their positions without clear trading guidelines. This impulsive mindset not only violates basic trading principles but also significantly increases trading risk. Therefore, traders must abandon these erroneous trading concepts and establish a scientific and rational trading system, responding to market fluctuations with a stable mindset and rigorous strategies.

In the two-way forex trading market, different participants have distinct competitive advantages and capabilities due to differences in resource endowments, operating models, and goal orientations.

---

Individual forex traders are inherently at a disadvantage in short-term trading. This disadvantage stems not from personal incompetence but rather from objective differences in market structure, resource allocation, and operational logic. This stands in stark contrast to the short-term advantages enjoyed by institutional traders.
In terms of institutional traders' short-term competitiveness, forex institutions, represented by investment banks, sovereign wealth funds, and hedge funds, possess "systemic advantages" that individual traders struggle to achieve. First, in terms of talent allocation, such institutions usually form professional teams composed of macro analysts, quantitative traders, and risk control experts. The team members have a solid foundation in financial theory and rich practical market experience. They can break down market logic from multiple dimensions such as macroeconomic data, geopolitical events, and monetary policy cycles, and accurately capture trading opportunities in short-term fluctuations; secondly, in terms of tools and technology, the institutions rely on strong financial strength and are equipped with professional market analysis systems, high-frequency trading algorithms and real-time data monitoring tools, which can achieve millisecond-level response to market fluctuations. At the same time, through complex strategies such as long-short hedging and cross-market arbitrage, the dual goals of risk hedging and profit capture are achieved in short-term trading; finally, at the strategy system level, the institutions have formed a full-process short-term trading framework from "market research and judgment-signal generation-order execution-risk control". Its strategy design not only focuses on short-term market fluctuations, but also combines its own capital scale and market liquidity to formulate operational short-term trading plans.
However, behind the short-term advantages of institutional traders lie inherent limitations in long-term investment. The core driver of these limitations lies in the institutions' time-sensitive performance evaluation mechanisms. Whether it's the quarterly performance rankings of mutual funds or the monthly return evaluations of hedge funds, institutional managers are required to demonstrate profitability to investors within a fixed period. This performance pressure makes it difficult for institutions to adopt a "long-term holding" strategy. Even if they identify a currency pair as a potential long-term trend, they may face investor redemptions or internal performance pressures due to short-term performance fluctuations, forcing them to close or adjust their positions prematurely. Furthermore, institutions have large capital structures. If they hold long-term positions, they bear multiple risks, such as exchange rate fluctuations and policy changes. Furthermore, large-scale capital inflows and outflows can impose "impact costs" on the market, further limiting their flexibility in long-term operations. This practical constraint of "not being able to hold positions for the long term" not only hinders institutions' ability to capture long-term trend gains but also puts them in a passive position when it comes to mindset management. Due to their constant focus on short-term performance, institutional traders are susceptible to short-term market fluctuations, making it difficult for them to maintain the composure and composure required for long-term investment. They are more prone to making emotional trading decisions when faced with market corrections or trend fluctuations.
In stark contrast to institutional traders, individual forex traders possess unique advantages in long-term investment, and the core of this advantage lies in their decision-making autonomy and position flexibility. First, individual traders do not need to face the pressure of periodic performance appraisals from institutions. Their investment goals are entirely determined by their own risk preferences and return expectations. They can choose to hold positions for weeks, months, or even years based on their judgment of the long-term market trend. There is no need to adjust positions due to short-term market fluctuations, and they can fully enjoy the compound interest brought by long-term trends. Secondly, the scale of individual traders' funds is relatively small, and there will be no significant impact costs when entering and exiting the market. They can also flexibly choose currency pairs and holding periods that suit their own capital amount, and have greater operational freedom in long-term investment. Finally, from the perspective of mentality management, individual traders are more likely to maintain the "patience and rationality" required for long-term investment because they have no external assessment pressure. After establishing a position in the early stage of trend formation, they can calmly deal with market pullbacks during the period without having to feel anxious about short-term losses or fluctuations. This "mentality advantage" can in turn help individual traders better adhere to long-term strategies and avoid missing out on long-term trend opportunities due to emotional operations.
From a market ecosystem perspective, the diverging strengths and weaknesses of individual and institutional traders is essentially a reflection of the specialized division of labor in the foreign exchange market: institutions, leveraging their resource and technological advantages, dominate the short-term trading market, achieving short-term profits through high-frequency trading and complex strategies. Individual traders, on the other hand, can leverage their decision-making flexibility and position autonomy to identify opportunities in long-term investment and capitalize on long-term trends. For individual traders, recognizing their weaknesses in short-term trading, avoiding "homogeneous competition" with institutions, and focusing instead on long-term investment, aligning their strengths with market trends, is the rational choice for achieving long-term profitability in the two-way foreign exchange market.

In China's two-way foreign exchange investment market, individual forex traders face numerous restrictions, and in some cases are even completely prohibited from participating.

---

This is primarily due to China's strict foreign exchange regulations. As of this writing, China has not approved any legal foreign exchange margin brokers. These regulatory measures do not exist in isolation but are based on a range of important macroeconomic objectives and policy considerations.
Maintaining financial stability. One of the core objectives of China's foreign exchange controls is to maintain financial stability. Disorderly capital flows can lead to domestic capital shortages, which in turn can impact economic development. Large capital outflows can also trigger a series of financial risks, such as currency devaluation. Foreign exchange controls can effectively limit disorderly capital flows and ensure the relative stability of domestic funds. Furthermore, large fluctuations in the foreign exchange market can trigger financial market instability, which in turn can affect the entire economic system. Controls can effectively control cross-border capital flows and mitigate exchange rate fluctuations and financial market volatility caused by large inflows or outflows of capital.
Stabilizing the local currency exchange rate. Exchange rate stability is crucial for import and export companies, the asset value of ordinary citizens, and the stable operation of the economy. Foreign exchange controls can stabilize the RMB exchange rate against other currencies through direct or indirect intervention in the foreign exchange market, preventing large exchange rate fluctuations from impacting the economy. A stable exchange rate helps maintain the competitiveness of domestic industries, especially export-oriented ones, where a stable exchange rate can avoid rising costs or declining profits due to exchange rate fluctuations.
Preventing Financial Risks. Foreign exchange controls play an important role in preventing financial risks. They can effectively combat illegal financial activities, such as money laundering, illicit capital flows, and financial speculation, and maintain the stability and security of the financial system. High-risk, anonymous trading methods, such as online foreign exchange transactions, can easily become vehicles for illegal fund transfers, and controls can effectively mitigate these risks. Furthermore, strict foreign exchange controls help prevent the spread of systemic financial risks and maintain financial market stability.
Promoting Sustainable Economic Development. Foreign exchange controls can guide the rational allocation of foreign exchange resources, preventing excessive flows into non-real economy sectors such as real estate and the stock market, thereby promoting the healthy development of the real economy. The government can also use foreign exchange control policies to prioritize the allocation of foreign exchange to key industries and sectors, supporting their development and promoting economic restructuring. Protecting National Economic Sovereignty. Foreign exchange controls are a crucial tool for safeguarding national economic sovereignty. They help prevent excessive foreign influence on the domestic economy and protect essential industries and strategic assets from foreign ownership. Through effective management of the foreign exchange market, China ensures the independence and autonomy of its economic policies and prevents external interference from impacting the stable development of the domestic economy.
In summary, China's regulatory measures on two-way foreign exchange investment transactions are based on a comprehensive consideration of multiple objectives: maintaining financial stability, stabilizing the local currency exchange rate, preventing financial risks, promoting sustainable economic development, and protecting national economic sovereignty. While these measures restrict individual foreign exchange traders, from a macro perspective, they are of significant significance for safeguarding national economic security and stability.

In two-way foreign exchange investment transactions, investors typically focus on the eight major currencies. The issuing countries or currency zones of these currencies generally do not implement strict foreign exchange controls.

---

The fundamental reason lies in the economic strength, currency status, and market maturity of these countries, which eliminate the need for regulations to "block" foreign exchange. Instead, they benefit more by liberalizing access. This phenomenon can be better understood through the following five key points:
First, the currency itself is sufficiently strong, eliminating the need for forced holding. Among the eight major currencies, the US dollar, euro, yen, and British pound are globally recognized as "hard currencies," accounting for over 90% of global foreign exchange reserves. Other currencies, such as the Australian dollar and Canadian dollar, are also considered by many countries as "secondary hard currencies" worth holding. For example, global oil transactions are largely settled in US dollars, and European commerce widely uses the euro. Since these currencies are already widely popular, there's no need to force foreign exchange to remain domestically through regulations. On the contrary, if regulations were implemented, people would worry about future convertibility issues and be reluctant to hold their currency, which would in turn damage the reputation of the domestic currency.
Second, the economy is highly dependent on the global market, and regulations would cut off financial flows. The economies of these countries are highly dependent on international trade and investment. For example, Australia's economy relies on iron ore exports, and New Zealand's on agricultural exports. Companies in the United States and Japan invest and build factories worldwide. Imposing foreign exchange controls, such as restricting the convertibility of export earnings into local currency or limiting overseas investment by domestic companies, would directly cut off these core sources of income. New Zealand, for example, relies on exports for 90% of its agricultural products. If foreign buyers cannot pay in New Zealand dollars, New Zealand farmers' milk and fruit will go unsold.
Third, highly sophisticated financial markets are capable of self-regulating risks. These countries boast some of the world's most developed financial markets, such as Wall Street in the United States and the City of London in the United Kingdom. These markets offer ample liquidity, flexible trading, and robust regulation. Faced with exchange rate fluctuations, they are able to adjust through market mechanisms, rather than relying on regulatory measures to mitigate risk. For example, if the yen depreciates, the Bank of Japan can raise interest rates to attract foreign investment in yen-denominated assets, thereby boosting the yen's exchange rate. In contrast, some smaller countries may only be able to stabilize their exchange rates by restricting capital outflows. If regulations are implemented, financial centers like London and Wall Street will lose their appeal, leading to capital outflows and even greater losses.
Fourth, capital flows are highly free, meeting the needs of domestic development. These countries are either major capital exporters (such as the United States and Japan, which have significant overseas investments) or need to attract foreign investment (such as European countries, which need foreign investment to build factories and conduct research and development). Opening foreign exchange markets and allowing free capital flows can achieve a virtuous cycle of "capital going out to earn profits, and capital coming in to promote development." For example, American companies need to convert dollars into local currencies to build factories in Southeast Asia, while foreign investors are willing to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds and invest their capital in the United States. This two-way capital flow cannot be achieved through regulation.
Fifth, regulations damage reputation and rules. Most of these countries are developed countries and major makers of global economic rules (such as G7 and OECD members). The rules they promote encourage free capital flows. If these countries impose foreign exchange controls, they will not only violate the rules they set, but will also question their credibility and undermine international cooperation. For example, Switzerland has long attracted deposits from wealthy individuals worldwide by claiming "capital freedom and a safe currency." If Switzerland suddenly implemented regulations, people would perceive Switzerland as no longer safe and withdraw their capital, severely damaging the Swiss banking industry.
Additional Note: This does not mean a complete refrain from intervention; it simply involves temporary measures in extreme circumstances. It should be noted that these countries do not completely refrain from foreign exchange intervention; they simply avoid long-term, blanket controls. For example, the Swiss National Bank temporarily adjusted its exchange rate rules in 2015, and the UK raised interest rates during the 1992 British Pound Crisis. However, these measures were emergency measures for specific crises, and once the crisis was resolved, normalcy would return. Long-term controls would not benefit these countries.
Summary: Whether to implement controls depends on confidence. Whether a country implements foreign exchange controls ultimately depends on whether it has sufficient confidence. The eight major currency countries, with their strong currencies, open economies, and mature markets, have the confidence to liberalize their foreign exchange markets to reap greater benefits. However, some countries implement controls because of insufficient foreign exchange reserves and weak market resilience, relying on "blocking" measures to achieve short-term stability. Simply put, if a country is sufficiently strong, there is no need for "blocking"; if it is weak, then "prevention" is necessary.

During forex trading, most traders are susceptible to emotional fluctuations caused by market fluctuations. When prices rise, they rush to close their positions and cash in profits, while when prices fall, they worry about further losses, ultimately leading to illogical trading strategies.

---

In fact, the key to stabilizing trading emotions isn't to suppress them. Instead, it's to fundamentally reduce the impact of emotions on trading decisions by establishing trading rules in advance, effectively controlling unknown risks, and rationally adjusting expectations.
The following five practical steps are accompanied by a clear implementation plan. Through systematic practice, traders can gradually reduce the negative impact of emotions on trading.
1. Calculate risk before executing trades: Use rigid rules to define the impact of fluctuations. The root cause of emotional anxiety caused by market fluctuations lies in traders' lack of clear understanding of the potential magnitude of losses. If losses can be locked in advance within a tolerable range, market fluctuations will become a "controllable normal" rather than an "unpredictable risk threat."
Core Practice 1: Limit losses on a single trade to 1%-2% of your principal.
Assuming a trader has $10,000 in principal, the maximum loss on a single trade should be between $100 and $200. The specific calculation involves working backward from your "tolerable loss" to determine the optimal position size:
For example, consider the EUR/USD exchange rate at 1.0800. The trader sets a stop-loss at 1.0750 (a 50-pip loss). Based on a contract size of 1 standard lot (€100,000), each pip fluctuation results in a $10 loss. A potential loss of 50 pips translates to $500, exceeding the $200 maximum loss limit. Therefore, the actual opening position size should be adjusted to 0.4 lots ($500 x 0.4 = $200).
This method allows traders to lock in their maximum losses in advance, even if the market moves against their expectations, effectively avoiding the anxiety caused by the fear of further losses.
Core Operation 2: Set stop-loss and take-profit levels when placing an order, eliminating the need for subsequent manual intervention.
Traders should avoid worrying about exiting a trade after market fluctuations. Instead, set both a stop-loss (automatically exiting the trade when losses reach a preset threshold) and a take-profit (automatically exiting the trade when profits reach a preset threshold) when placing an order, allowing the trading platform to automatically execute these actions.
For example, a trader may enter a long position on the GBP/USD at 1.2500 and set a stop-loss of 1.2450 (a 50-point loss) and a take-profit of 1.2600 (a 100-point profit). Once these settings are in place, there's no need to constantly monitor the market; positions will automatically close according to the preset conditions, regardless of price movements, thus avoiding emotional fluctuations caused by hesitation.
Second, avoid using essential funds for trading: Use idle funds to maintain a stable mindset. A major cause of trading turmoil is investing funds that traders cannot afford to lose. If trading funds are needed for fixed expenses like rent and mortgage repayments, even small market fluctuations can cause traders to experience intense emotional stress due to concerns about the impact on their daily lives.
Core Principle: Only use idle funds that will not be needed for the next 3-5 years.
For example, if a trader has a 100,000 yuan deposit, they can withdraw 30,000-50,000 yuan for forex trading, leaving the remaining funds for daily expenses and emergency reserves. Even if this portion of trading funds suffers a short-term loss, it will not affect their daily lives. This will naturally keep the trader's mindset stable and reduce the risk of anxiety caused by small market fluctuations.
Conversely, if a trader invests their entire 100,000 yuan savings in trading, or even borrows funds, once market prices fall, they will find themselves caught in a dilemma: eager to cut losses while fearing further losses. Their emotions will inevitably be dominated by market fluctuations.
Third, Accept the Normality of Losses: Guide Emotional Management Through Cognitive Adjustment. Some traders experience significant emotional fluctuations due to the cognitive bias that "trading must be profitable." Once losses occur, they deny their ability, leading to an imbalanced mentality. However, there are no "absolutely profitable" trades in the forex market. Even experienced traders may experience losses in 30%-40% of their trades. The key to profitable trading is that the gains from profitable trades exceed the losses from losing trades.
Two Practical Methods for Cognitive Adjustment:
Establish a trading log: After each trade, carefully record your entry logic, stop-loss and take-profit settings, and actual profit and loss results. Through consistent recording and review, traders will gradually realize that losses are a normal part of trading, not a result of personal incompetence. For example, if out of 10 trades, 6 are profitable and 4 are losing, and the average gain on each profitable trade is 100 pips, while the average loss on each losing trade is 50 pips, the overall return is still positive.
Consider each loss a trading cost: Just as running a store requires rent and purchasing costs, trading losses can be considered "necessary costs of profit." As long as "total profits exceed total losses" over the long-term trading cycle, the trading strategy is considered effective, and there's no need to dwell on individual losses.
Fourth, Reduce the Frequency of Market Monitoring: Avoid the recurring emotional triggers of short-term fluctuations. The forex market fluctuates continuously 24 hours a day. If traders constantly monitor the market, every minute and every second of price changes will repeatedly affect their emotions. A small price increase will cause them to rush to close their positions due to concerns about "profit taking." A small price drop will cause them to rush to stop losses due to concerns about "expanding losses." This can ultimately lead to irrational trading driven by emotion.
The optimal frequency of market monitoring should be determined based on the trading cycle.
Traders don't need to monitor the market indiscriminately. Instead, they should develop a monitoring plan based on their chosen trading cycle:
Short-term trading (e.g., 1-hour or 4-hour cycles): Monitor the market 2-3 times daily (e.g., 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM, and 8:00 PM). Each monitoring session should be limited to approximately 15 minutes, primarily to confirm effective execution of stop-loss and take-profit orders. The remaining time should be spent focusing on daily work and personal life.
Long-term trading (e.g., daily or weekly cycles): Monitor the market only once daily, or even every other day. Because price fluctuations in long-term trading take a long time to develop, frequent monitoring will only increase unnecessary anxiety.
For example, if a trader enters a daily trading cycle and sets stop-loss and take-profit orders on Monday, they should not monitor the market on Tuesday and Wednesday, and only conduct a position review on Thursday. Short-term price fluctuations during this period will not materially affect the long-term trend and will naturally avoid triggering emotional fluctuations.
5. Establish an emotional buffer: Pause trading when abnormal signals appear. Even after completing the four steps above, traders may still experience anxiety during unexpected market fluctuations (such as policy adjustments or the release of important economic data). At this point, there's no need to force yourself to trade. Instead, set a "pause rule" to avoid impulsive, emotion-driven moves.
Two major trading pause signals:
Single-day losses exceeding 3% of principal: If a trader with $10,000 in principal experiences cumulative daily losses of $300, regardless of how favorable the subsequent market trend may appear, trading should be paused. Close the trading software and calm down by taking a walk, watching a movie, or other means. At this point, the trader's emotions have been affected by the losses, and continuing to trade can easily lead to operational errors and further losses.
Three consecutive losing trades: Even if the individual losses are small, three consecutive losing trades indicate that your current trading strategy may be misaligned with market dynamics. In this case, you should pause trading for one to two days, review your trading log to identify any issues, and avoid continuing to trade with a desire to recoup your losses.
Just as feeling tired while driving requires a break, pausing trading is a necessary step to regain rationality when trading emotions become abnormal—a brief period of adjustment allows traders to approach the market objectively.
Summary: The key to maintaining a stable trading mood lies in "controllability." Market volatility is an inherent characteristic of forex trading. Traders cannot control price movements, but they can gain control over the trading process by standardizing operating rules, clarifying risk boundaries, and adjusting their expectations. When traders clearly understand their maximum loss margin, exit triggers, capital safety margins, and the normal nature of losses, every action is within their control. Market fluctuations become "normal trends in line with expectations" rather than "unexpected variables that disrupt trading plans," and trading emotions naturally remain stable.
In short, the key to managing emotions isn't "being unaffected by market fluctuations" but "controlling the impact of market fluctuations within acceptable limits."

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---